Business School vs. Social Sciences

I have a degree in International Politics, I have been years in the Social Science School, I had meet people there and I spent many hours in different classes about History, Politics, Global Economy and even Sociology. In my thesis I made an analysis of the changes in the global balance of power during the XIX century with the 1898 Spanish-American War as an example of this new realty and the emerge of the United States as a global power.

For 5 years I have been working in Marketing, all I know about business I learned it doing my job, so I decided to attend to an MBA to change my professional profile from International Politics to a business related degree.

I have been in this MBA for only 2 weeks and I already find a big difference with my years in Social Science School, probably I'll have a different perspective after I finish my Master but right now this is what I think.

MBA: Lack of reflection, Lack of deep debate
International Politics: Lack of action

Why does someone study Social Science and why does someone study Business? This is an open question with thousands of possible answers but I will tell you my opinion.

What I felt during my years in Social Science School was that most people there wanted to understand what's going on in our planet, to think about world's future and past and to analyze global realty. They weren't there to learn how to do something, or to gain some particular skill. That's why during classes was common to have long debates about former empires and wars, and the causes of changes in societies, sometimes endless debates without arriving to any conclusion because of the understandable high complexity of world's realty. People finish their studies with a huge knowledge about the international system logic but without a particular skill.

What I felt during this first 2 weeks in my MBA was the exact opposite, people attend to a Business School to get tools and skills to progress in their professional careers. In case they have their own business, to increase sales, market shares and profits. In case they are in a big company, to get better jobs and higher positions. It's also common that students uses an MBA as a way to extend their networking. But nobody wants to understand anything deeper than how to do bussines or improve in the bussines world. So I guess when you graduate from a Business School you know how to do stuff, you have business technical knowledge but society looks the same to you than before you started studying.

Because of all this I think that Business and Social Sience are absolutely different but both can contribute, in different ways to your personal growth. My tip would be, study both!

My Inca Trail Survival Kit

I did the Inca Trail a couple of weeks ago. The views are amazing and I really loved the experience. I truly recommend to do it.

Here is my survival kit. I hope by writing this to make you enjoy double the whole experience.

• Flashlight: you need one for two reasons: there is no light at the camps (so you need it to go to the toilet) and there is no light on the trail. If you hit the road at night, you are going to need it.
• Two small bottles of water: drink small quantities of water. And don't drop the bottles! (see next tip). You can buy this two bottles on the first day of the trail. Local people sell them along the way.
• Water purification pills: at the end of the second day, the fresh water is over :). You can use some facilities to extract water and use this pills. You have to wait two hours before you can drink the water.
  
• Baby tissues: Imagine yourself walking three days in a row, sweating, with no showers. You arrive to the camp, and you really going to love to clean yourself with tissues.
  
• Three t-shirts: cusco and surroundings are really humid places. If you hang a dry t-shirt inside your tent, it's going to be wet by the morning. All the sweaty t-shirts must be used during the day, because you walk so hard that your body heat compensates the humidity. Try to keep your things dry!
  
• Two pants: try to use the first one as long as you can. You can use the fresh one on the fourth day on Machu Picchu.
  
• Medium/Small backpack: The smaller the backpack, the better. The perfect backpack is really small, but with the belt on the waist, so you can distribute the weight in different points of you body.
• Plastic bags: As I said before, the place is really humid. All your clothes must be wrap up with bags. Everything must be in a bag. You can carry an extra set of bags, in case you want to use them to isolate your shoes from your socks.
• Sleeping bag: The smaller, the better. Try to use a mountain sleeping bag. You are going to sleep 3900meters over the sea with really cold weather.
• Walking stick: the path is really irregular. Goes up and down all the time. Sometimes you need the stick to equilibrate yourself. If you slide sideways, you're going to end up 2000meter below.
  
• Poncho: Buy the best poncho on Cusco. I bought one for u$10, that saved my hole trip. It was really big, so I could cover my backpack and myself with it.
• Sunscreen: The sun is really strong. If it is cloudy, use it anyway. (60factor). I used 30 because I wanted to get a sun-tan :) ...(shallow ... right?)
  

I wish you the best time!! it is unbelieveable!
Enjoy it!

Falkland Islands: The British Empire Strikes Back

The UK has interests, some of them innegotiable. That's the conclusion I can deduce after the Argentine-British mini-crisis initiated after the Desire Petroleum oil drilling announcement.

The Falkland Islands is an important issue for Argentina and Great Britain, these two nations feels this south atlantic islands as part of its territory and exploitation of strategic natural resources in this region is a sensible topic.

I can certainly say that what happend during the first months of 2010 was the highest tension between Argentina and Great Britain since the 1982 war, and the british policy on this matter seems to be as determined as is used to be in the early 80's.

Back in 1982 Argentina invaded the Islands and recovered sovereign on them, some people, including argentine government members thought the UK will never send troops to this distant territory located at a 14.000 km distance from London. We know what happend was the exact opposite, the UK supported by the NATO powers recovered the Islands after a 74 days war.

Nowadays, 28 years after the conflict the British interest in this archipelago remains the same, the following article published at dailymail.co.uk clearly explains how committed London is with the Falklands and how decided is this european nation to use, if necessary, the force to protect this overseas territory.

Argentina threatens to ban firms operating in the Falklands as Royal Navy sends attack submarine (dailymail.co.uk - March 17, 2010)

Argentina upped the ante over the Falkland Islands today by threatening to ban firms operating in the British colony.

Companies were warned they face having to choose between the Falklands and Argentina under proposed new legislation.

Argentine MPs are set to debate a bill imposing a 30-day deadline on firms to axe ties with the Falklands or face being kicked out of the south American country.

The move, led by Argentine cinema director and politician Pino Solanas, has the backing of the country's former Chancellor Rafael Bielsa.

Supporters of the new bill said they hoped to target firms like Barclays, a shareholder of British firm Desire Petroleum which is currently drilling for oil in the Falklands.

The search for oil has reignited the Falklands Islands dispute.

Today it was reported a Royal Navy attack submarine has been sent to the Falklands to boost security amid mounting speculation oil has been discovered.

The Ministry of Defence has refused to confirm the sub's presence there, saying it does not comment on submarine operations.

HMS Sceptre, a Swiftsure-class nuclear powered submarine, is said to have been sent from southern Africa to make Argentina think twice about laying serious claims to the Islands.

It is the oldest seagoing vessel in the Royal Navy.

The vessel is equipped with Spearfish anti-ship torpedoes and took three weeks to reach the Falklands.

The British military has four vessels stationed in the area on a routine, rotating basis: a Naval destroyer, a patrol vessel, a survey ship, and a Royal auxiliary ship.

HMS York, a Type 42 destroyer, is partolling off the island's capital of Port Stanley.

HMS Scott, a survey vessel, is also nearby and the fleet has air support from a squadron of RAF Typhoon fighter jets based on the islands.

If the report about the submarine is true, it would be an addition to routine forces there.

The submarine, which was built in 1978, is 82 metres long and is equipped with sonar, attack and search periscopes, collision avoidance radar and electronic warfare. In addition, she has five torpedo tubes capable of firing the Spearfish.

Desire Petroleum, currently drilling for oil, is expected to announce next week if it has had success.

In the past month Argentine president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner has reasserted Argentina's claim to the Falklands and asked for the U.S. to intervene.

The Argentine government has also tabled a UN resolution condemning Britain for allowing oil exploration off the Falklands.

Former Argentine Chancellor Rafael Bielsa last night urged successor Jorge Taiana 'to do everything in his power to increase the cost of the search for oil'.

Experts claim there could be as much as 60 billion barrels of crude oil under Falkland's waters.

Argentina has renewed claims in recent weeks that Britain is illegally occupying the islands.

The archipelago, which it calls Las Malvinas, remains an emotive issue for people in Argentina. Bringing up the issue of sovereignty offers a way for a populist president to whip up public support.

Argentina has claimed the South Atlantic islands since Britain established its rule in the 19th century and invaded the Falklands in 1982.

After a two-month war, they were forced to withdraw their troops. But Argentines still maintain they have claim to the archipelago, which lies 300 miles from its coast.

In the past month, Argentine president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner has reasserted their claim and has objected to the British oil exploration.

She asked for the U.S. to intervene in the row, and secured backing from Secretary of State Hilary Clinton to open talks.

Both Britain and the Falklands governments have said there will be no negotiation over the islands and believe there is no issue to resolve.

The Argentine government has also tabled a UN resolution condemning Britain for allowing oil exploration off the Falklands.

President Kirchner issued a decree last month forcing ships sailing to the Falklands from Argentina to seek a permit after learning that the rig was to start drilling.

She has also secured backing from 32 South American nations supporting its claim that Britain has occupied the islands illegally since 1833.

The issue has been so emotive for her people that protests against British 'occupation' have been organised by former soldiers in Buenos Aires.

Last Wednesday, protesters carrying petrol bombs were stopped by police as they tried to storm the British Embassy in the city.

This morning, the Ministry of Defence would not discuss whether Sceptre had been deployed.

A spokesman said: 'We do not comment on submarine operations.'

Communism: Two lines in world's history

Is really interesting the perspective we have about World's History. It doesn't matter how important an historical process is, what really matters is how much it means to you, to the time you are living in and how affects your personal life. For an average citizen is difficult to imagine what does 300 or 3000 years means, if it is related to you 10 years will mean much more than 100.

This little introduction is to talk about Communism, something that is a really big deal for the baby boomers and even for younger people, something that influenced the life of almost every single person on earth, something than now, in 2010 looks so important for history but that some day will be resumed in 2 lines or in a single paragraph in some history book.

Why I'm saying this, that is so difficult to understand for someone who has suffered the Vietnam War, the military governments in Latin America or simply the fear of a final nuclear war between the US and de USSR?

I'm saying this because I have been thinking about the perspective and the size and influence of former Empires. The first example I will use is something that concerns directly to the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America but that it has also influenced the entire western hemisphere and some regions of Africa and Asia. This first example is the Spanish Empire, Spain successfully controlled Latin America since the first quarter of the XVII Century until the first quarter of the XIX Century, 300 years of domination of a surface of nearly 18 millons square kilometers and the aniquilation of several languages and religions. Is hard to understand what did this Empire meant for generations and generations of native americans or europeans that were sent to the new world.
All latin american nations will celebrate during the next years the Bicentennial of their independence, countries that during this last 200 years has built its own identity and history. This 200 years period is still a century shorter than the Spanish domination of this part of the world and it seems to be much more relevant to latin american societies than the colonial times. So, if the 300 years that the Spanish's exerted sovereignty in Latin America are despised over the 200 yeras of independence of the american spanish speaking countries what can we say about Communism that influenced people life for only 74 years?

Yes 74 years, since the 1917 russian revolution until de dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Probably you will ask about China, Cuba and North Korea, in my defense I say that the "real socialism" threat ended with the Perestroika. These other Countries will, latter or sooner migrate to a market economy system.

If we think about older historical processes the size of Communism becomes almost insignificant, the Roman Empire controlled Europe, Northern Africa and the Middle East for 400 years, and the Egyptian civilization developed for more than 3 millenniums.

We could continue with more examples, and we will always arrive to the same conclusion, the relevance of a certain Empire, civilization or historical process depends on the perspective of the observer, that's why I say that Communism is a big deal for us, but some day will be explained in 2 lines, because 74 years in world's history is only that, 2 lines.